DIVERGE

DIGITIAL

 Where law meets innovation.


OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DIVERGE LEGAL

the blog

Beyond the $1 Billion Headline: How Disney Turned Its IP into an AI Equity Play

OpenAI is not paying Disney in cash for those character rights. Instead, Disney is being compensated entirely in stock warrants—options to buy more equity in OpenAI at today’s valuation—on top of its already announced $1 billion equity investment. This isn’t just a licensing deal. It is a bet that generative AI will be so valuable that trading immediate IP revenue for upside in the AI company itself is worth the risk. For creators, this shift has profound implications.

Read More

Disney-OpenAI Deal Impact on the Creator Economy: Usage Rights & AI Training

Disney’s latest moves with OpenAI and Google didn’t just shake up Hollywood—they quietly reset the baseline for what creators should be asking for in every contract in 2026. This article is your quick 3-step reference guide (with practical tips) that you can keep beside you when you mark up a deal, or share with your clients to help them negotiate fair deals. Bonus: check out the 3 Step Checklist for Your Next Brand Deal at the end!

Read More

Disney–OpenAI: What the $1B Licensing Deal Means for Creator IP

Disney and OpenAI announced a three-year, $1 billion licensing deal that fundamentally redefines how IP holders negotiate with AI platforms. Starting in early 2026, the Sora video generation platform will host over 200 iconic characters from the Disney, Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars universes—allowing users to create sanctioned AI-generated content.

Read More
Business & Entertainment Diverge Legal Business & Entertainment Diverge Legal

Hostile Takeover: The $108 Billion War for Warner Bros. (Part II)

The $82.7 billion Netflix-WBD deal is no longer a definitive agreement. Paramount Skydance has launched a hostile tender offer for the entire company at $30.00 per share in all-cash, dramatically escalating the auction to an enterprise value of $108.4 billion. This aggressive maneuver immediately places the WBD Board in a fiduciary trap. Under M&A principles (such as the Revlon standard), the Board's duty shifts to maximizing shareholder value, forcing them to justify why the lower, stock-component Netflix offer is superior to a higher, all-cash bid. The decision hinges not only on price but on opposing antitrust...

Read More

The $82.7 Billion Question – Should the Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Be Blocked? (Part I)

The Netflix acquisition of Warner Bros.'s film and TV studios, including HBO and HBO Max, for an estimated $82.7 billion is not merely a corporate transaction; it's a structural shift that concentrates unprecedented power and IP under one roof. This deal eliminates a major buyer for new content, leading to market consolidation that directly impacts every creator's ability to negotiate favourable terms, compensation, and ownership. The size of this transaction immediately triggered intense scrutiny under anti-trust and competition law globally, with major…

Read More

The Real Reason OpenAI Just “Banned” Legal + Medical Advice

ChatGBPT’s usage policy change isn't an altruistic act to protect the public, nor is it a concession to pressure from regulated industry professionals.

This is a cold, calculated, and entirely self-motivated business decision. OpenAI is not in the business of protecting the profit margins of lawyers or doctors. It is in the business of becoming one of the most valuable companies in the world. This decision was made by OpenAI's risk-assessment strategists to protect one entity and one entity only: OpenAI itself.

Read More

Will AI Replace Lawyers? What Creators Really Risk with AI Contract Review

It’s impossible to ignore the headlines proclaiming that the legal profession is under threat from Artificial Intelligence. The narrative is compelling: sophisticated AI will soon be able to analyze cases, draft flawless documents, and provide legal help at a fraction of the cost, leading to a future where clients prefer a chatbot to a boardroom. For creators accustomed to the fast pace of technological change…

Read More

Why Every Creator Needs a Lawyer on Their Team (Before the Big Deal)

The creative industry is booming, but as more artists, influencers, and independent creators step into the digital marketplace, legal challenges are becoming unavoidable. Whether you’re an artist licensing your work, a content creator negotiating brand deals, or a small business leveraging social media for growth, legal protection is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Read More

Disclaimer

Diverge Legal by Kicz Legal Professional Corporation (“Diverge Legal” or the “Company”) takes reasonable care to make sure that the information on Diverge Digital (the “blog”) is complete at the time it was posted. However, the information may not be comprehensive or current and is provided for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon for legal advice. You should consult a qualified lawyer on any specific legal question or matter.

Diverge Legal is not responsible and all liability is excluded for any damage or loss due to any reliance upon the information on this blog. Use of the information on this blog is at your own risk.

Links from this blog are provided for convenience, and do not suggest an affiliation with or endorsement by the author or the Company. Diverge Legal is not responsible for the content of external sites that link to this blog or that are linked from this blog.

This blog is for informational purposes only. The content is not legal advice and no lawyer-client relationship is created by accessing or otherwise using this blog or by communicating with the author by email or through this blog. Neither the Company nor the author of the blog guarantee the confidentiality of any communication via email or through this blog.